Comparing traditional and commercial nixtamalization of three maize landraces: impact on pozole quality and consumer acceptance

Table 3 Magnitudes of difference obtained with triangular tests with repeated measurements (n = 90; k = 2), for pairs of flowered grains

Compared pairs	Over dispersion (γ)	d’ Value	Significance (Ho: p = 0.33)	Power of the test (1 − β)
AN vs EO	0.006	1.61	1.0 × 10^–7	0.99
AN vs CAC	0.107	1.97	1.0 × 10^–7	0.99
EO vs CAC	0.010	1.41	1.5 × 10^–5	0.98
CAC vs Commercial CAC	0.006	2.33	4.0 × 10^–6	0.99

AN = Ancho; EO = Elotes Occidentales; CAC = Cacahuacintle; all with traditional nixtamalization method
Commercial CAC = Cacahuacintle with commercial nixtamalization method
n = number of consumers, k = repeated measurements

ISSN: 2352-619X