Skip to main content

Table 4 Means comparison of sensory descriptors of flowered grain prepared with Ancho (AN), Cacahuacintle (CAC) and Elotes Occidentales (EO) landrace nixtamalized by the traditional method and Commercial CAC by commercial nixtamalization

From: Comparing traditional and commercial nixtamalization of three maize landraces: impact on pozole quality and consumer acceptance

 

AN

EO

CAC

Commercial CAC

Appearance

Lightness

0.87 c

0.27 d

1.44 b

9.73 a

Yellow

11.43 a

0.47 c

9.92 b

0.33 c

Purple

0.12 b

7.17 a

0.14 b

0.12 b

Size

10.38 a

6.81 b

7.50 b

7.96 b

Flowered

4.58 c

5.25 c

8.30 a

6.62 b

Dent

9.71 a

6.14 b

4.88 c

4.12 c

Aroma

Dough

5.35 b

6.08 ab

6.10 a

2.76 c

Nejayote

8.21 a

6.60 b

5.77 b

3.60 c

Acetic acid

0.48 b

0.27 b

0.19 b

3.04 a

Sulfuric acid

0.33 b

0.29 b

0.18 b

1.51 a

Texture

Rugosity

6.78 a

5.06 b

6.19 a

3.66 c

Hardness

5.44 b

6.27 a

3.22 c

3.83 c

Moisture

4.20 b

3.55 b

5.03 a

5.47 a

Cohesiveness

6.59 b

6.49 b

6.46 b

7.47 a

Granularity

4.48 b

5.98 a

3.59 c

2.65 d

Flavor

Acid

0.27 b

0.14 b

0.15 b

4.11 a

Sweet

0.96 a

0.94 a

1.14 a

0.36 b

Dough

4.62 a

4.97 a

4.72 a

2.93 b

Lime

0.90 a

0.64 ab

0.67 ab

0.54 b

  1. Letters in the same row indicate statistically significant differences (Tukey, 0.05)