Bhattarai et al. [13]
|
Nepal
|
Local farmer (n = 91), Focus Group Discussion (FGD) (n = 4, 10–12 participants)
|
Case studies, in-depth interviews, FGD, and participant’s observation
|
Gender inequality due to socio-structural norms; undermines the climate change adaptation
|
Khan et al. [14]
|
Pakistan
|
Local communities (n = 120, 87 male and 33 female)
|
In-depth interviews
|
Lack of awareness of ethnobotanical plants; results in the careless use of natural resources
|
Salick et al. [15]
|
Tibet, China
|
Sample size (Not mentioned)
|
Ethnobotanical method and qualitative in-depth interviews
|
The severe impact of climatic change on the livelihood, lifestyle, and traditional Tibetan culture of herding of animals
|
Byg and Salick [16]
|
Tibet, China
|
Indigenous communities (n = 90, 45 female and 45 male)
|
Semi-structured interviews
|
Localized meaning of climate change based on socio-cultural, spiritual, and moral factors
|
Gómez-Baggethun et al. [17]
|
Spain
|
Local people (n = 33), FGD (n = 3, 4–6 individuals)
|
Interviews, FGD, and systematic reviews of historical archives
|
Traditional beliefs systems associated with socio-ecological knowledge are crucial for a sustainable long-term solution
|
Von Borgstede et al. [18]
|
Sweden, US, UK, and Japan
|
Opinion poll (n = 1500) in 2005 (n = 742) and 2010 (n = 615)
|
The longitudinal survey, opinion poll, close-ended questionnaires
|
Climate change is the reality; sustainable environmental friendly consumption choices possible solution
|
Semenza et al. [19]
|
Portland and Houston
|
Participants (n = 1202, female = 787 and male = 415)
|
Mixed methodology
|
The negligence of socio-structural norms; barriers in climate mitigation efforts
|
Gentle and Maraseni [20]
|
Nepal
|
Local household (n = 485)
|
In-depth interviews, FGD, key informants interviews
|
Social inequalities and inequity in resource allocation due to climate change; affecting vulnerable communities
|
Vedwan [21]
|
Himachal Pradesh, India
|
Apple growers (n = 58)
|
Semi-structured interviews
|
Shift in traditional cropping pattern due to climate change in the Himalayan region
|
Chaudhary and Bawa [22]
|
India and Nepal
|
Households (n = 225)
|
In-depth interviews, focus group discussion
|
The shift in agricultural practices of indigenous communities. For example, apple production has severely been affected
|
Katwal et al. [23]
|
Bhutan
|
Indigenous farmers (n = 404, male = 237, and female = 167)
|
Survey with close-ended questionnaires
|
The loss of one-third of traditional agrobiodiversity in the region; emphasis on adoption of crops according to different agro-ecological zones
|
Oo et al. [24]
|
Myanmar
|
Local farmers (n = 178), FGD (n = 7)
|
In-depth interviews, FGD
|
Poor socio-economic status negatively affects the adaptation policies in society
|
Bhadwal et al. [25]
|
Sikkim, India
|
Local communities FGD (n = 8)
|
In-depth interviews, FGD
|
Gender norms in traditional communities affect adaptation; due to lack of access to human, financial, and natural capitals
|
Guyot et al. [26]
|
Canada
|
Aboriginal communities (n = 2)
|
In-depth interviews, FGD
|
Impact of climate change on traditional dietary practices and consumption
|
Ford [27]
|
Canada
|
Nunavut community
|
In-depth interviews, FGD
|
Impact of climate change on traditional dietary practices
|
Upadhaya et al. [28]
|
Meghalaya, India
|
Tribal community (n = 2)
|
In-depth interviews, FGD
|
Traditional agriculture practice could result in sustainable consumption and environment
|
Pieniak et al. [29]
|
Europe
|
Consumer survey (n = 4828)
|
Cross-sectional quantitative survey
|
Traditional food consumption depends on familiarity, naturalness, and health benefits
|
Rojas-Rivas et al. [30]
|
Mexico City
|
Consumer survey (n = 610)
|
In-depth interviews
|
The association of traditional norms positively influence the dietary habits
|
Akintan et al. [31]
|
Nigeria
|
The household survey (n = 350)
|
Household surveys, semi-structured interviews
|
‘Ethnic-specific’ traditional norms and taboos crucial in food choices of traditional society
|
Chakraborty et al. [32]
|
Uttarakhand, India
|
Local households (n = 62)
|
Household surveys, semi-structured interviews
|
Socio-cultural norms are significant sustainable environment and dietary choices
|
Malhotra et al. [33]
|
Himachal Pradesh, India
|
Local people (n = 20), FGD (n = 3)
|
In-depth interviews, FGD
|
Socio-ecological changes and affected the cultural norms linked to eating practices
|
Singh et al. [34]
|
Kashmir, India
|
Native people (n = 113)
|
Household surveys, interviews, semi-structured interviews
|
Ethnobotanical knowledge is crucial for novel nutraceutical products
|
Nautiyal and Kaechele [35]
|
India
|
Sample size (not mentioned)
|
Household surveys, semi-structured interviews
|
Traditional mountain farming is sustainable for the environment and indigenous societies
|
Negi and Maikhuri [36]
|
Uttarakhand, India
|
Local villages (n = 62, sample size not mentioned)
|
Household surveys, semi-structured interviews, in-depth interviews
|
Traditional agro diversity is insurance against disease and extreme climatic fluctuations
|